Seth.D's Forum

I was thinking, 7 rates just seems like way to much, as we have little LR's and even though rating is decent now it still prevents moving, it slow things down. How about makeing it 5 bests to move, and keep good and spam as is. I mean it doesnt hurt to change. '.

_________________
Strm




I believe in Jesus Christ as my Savior. If you do too and aren't scared to admit it, then copy and paste this in your signature.
Put this on your signature if you're one of the 4% who will stand up for God.

Stamp Collection

Err...I was maybe thinking along the lines of 3 spams, 4 goods, and 5 bests. I mean, it seems a bit more balanced I suppose...

_________________
http://www.sethforum.com/sethforum/view ... 772#p12772

This is PieHunter, former Level Mover, Moderator, Level Rater Admin, Great User, and Co-Admin signing off for the last time.

Haha, yeah right! P.s. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jUj_XJ9 ... re=related <-I. CAN. NOT. STOP. LAUGHING.

ummm, if we change 5 bests to move, then it would be the same standard for goods. 5.

it needs to be higher than goods, because bests is better than goods.

and yes. it needs to be more balanced, but if wwe change things now, nothing will make sense anymore that is currently in UML, and in Moved levels.

wait untill the UML is clean, and then we can change the rating system to a reasonable, balanced system.

how about it'll just affect levels in the user made levels, not in the moved levels? Besides, it won't sprout too much confusion in the moved levels area, seeing as how this could be a big fat global announcement informing everyone of CHANGE. REAL CHANGE! the new requirements.. For the newcomers who just decide to look at old level reviews on a whim...well, I'm not sure this will be a HUGE problem. If they (hopefully) used their common sense, they would send a concerned PM to the staff.

Also, if it does affect the UML, wouldn't that be a good thing? Spams don't get changed so none are going there when this takes affect. Levels will be hauled into the goods and bests vault. I don't see how that's a bad thing at all, dealing with the UML compared with the massive Moved levels.

_________________
http://www.sethforum.com/sethforum/view ... 772#p12772

This is PieHunter, former Level Mover, Moderator, Level Rater Admin, Great User, and Co-Admin signing off for the last time.

Haha, yeah right! P.s. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jUj_XJ9 ... re=related <-I. CAN. NOT. STOP. LAUGHING.

Holy crap, as i read, i understood what your saying.

As Level Mover Admin, i approve of the rating system being changed to 4 Goods to be moved to Goods section, 5 Bests to be moved to Bests section.

all in favor say "I"

I
aye
eye
ai



well that means i agree 4x

_________________
the fuck is this

I don't even rate or post but whatever. XD

I.

Well, its too much trouble, because levels thatg are moved, and in UML, we have to do a crap load of LM'ing, but since im a LM i guess its my duty... so

I.

Did you even read Pie's post?....

He said that just forget the moved levels, leave them be.

_________________
DanmanGaz/Danichu

Super I!

I.. Only because one of my levels have fives best rates, and I want it moved. Lol, jk, it'll make the UML feel more active and what not.

_________________
I be Level Rater. PM me to rate your level.

I also be Level Mover. PM me to move your level.

well, it seems that the most of us are all in favor of this. And, both candidates for new LRA are supporters of this.

so it can officialy be said, that this change will happen.

Well This Has Been Answered The The Limit Changed! TOPIC LOCKED!